5 Reasons Not to Buy the FlightScope Mevo Gen2

Alright, guys, if you’ve been following the channel, you know I’ve been impressed by the new FlightScope Mevo Gen2. I’ve talked about its accuracy, the lack of subscription fees, its simulator readiness, and the fact that it gives you so much of the Mevo+ experience at a much lower price point.

So, let me be clear right up front: I like this product. I think it’s one of the most compelling launch monitors we’ve seen in the under-$2,000 category. For a lot of golfers, it’s going to be a great fit.

But — and this is important — no product is perfect. And as much as I like the Mevo Gen2, it’s not the right choice for everybody.

So today, I’m putting on my devil’s advocate hat. After all, I’m also an attorney. I’m accustomed to considering the argument from both sides. So I’m going to break down five reasons you should not buy the FlightScope Mevo Gen2.

As always, I’ll give you my real-world take on where this product shines and where it might leave you disappointed.

Let’s get into it.

Let’s start with the elephant in the room.

Yes, the Mevo Gen2 runs on the same Fusion Tracking technology as the Mevo+ and even the $15,000 X3C. Yes, it directly measures 18 ball and club parameters, which is great.

But if you’ve done your homework, you probably know that the Mevo+ offers upgrade paths — the Pro Package and Face Impact Location — that take the data to a whole new level.

With the Pro Package, you unlock advanced club metrics like face-to-path, dynamic loft, swing plane, low point, and vertical descent angle.

With Face Impact Location, you literally see strike heat maps on the clubface. That’s huge for fitters, coaches, and serious players who want the most detailed feedback.

Here’s the problem: the Gen2 doesn’t support either of those upgrades. At lesat not today.

Could that change in the future? Maybe. The hardware is capable. The Gen2 runs the same Fusion Tracking engine as the Mevo+. But as of right now, if you buy a Gen2, you’re buying a closed system. What you see is what you get.

And for a lot of golfers, that’s fine. But if you’re the kind of player who wants all the numbers, or you think you might want them later, you’re probably going to outgrow the Gen2.

That means you either buy the Mevo+ now while you still can, or you wait and see if FlightScope eventually opens up those upgrades to the Gen2 platform. But as of today, the Mevo+ is still the only way to guarantee you can unlock every layer of data.

So reason number one not to buy the Gen2: limited expandability.

This is a classic radar launch monitor issue, and it’s not going away with the Gen2.

Because the Gen2 reads shots via Doppler radar combined with synrhconized image processing, it needs space to work.

 Specifically, you need 8 feet behind the ball for the unit itself, and another 8 feet in front of the ball if you’re hitting indoors. That’s a minimum of 16 total feet of clear runway.

If you’re outside at the range, no problem. But if you’re setting up a home simulator in your garage or basement, this can be a dealbreaker. Not everyone has that kind of space.

And here’s where camera-based competitors like the Square Golf Launch Monitor have an advantage. They’re more forgiving indoors because they sit to the side of the golf ball and therefore require a lot less room depth.

So if you’ve got a tight setup and you’re dreaming of a home simulator, the Mevo Gen2 might not physically fit your space. And that’s something you definitely want to figure out before dropping $1,199.

So reason number two not to buy the Gen2: You need a big room.

Now let’s talk software.

First of all, one of the great things about FlightScope is that they don’t nickel-and-dime you with subscriptions. You get the FS Golf app, you get E6 Connect with eight included courses, and you’re good to go. No ongoing fees unless you opt for third-party software. That’s awesome.

But here’s the flip side: Compared to what Rapsdodo and even Garmin are doing with their apps, the FS Golf interface is starting to feel a little… well, old.

Don’t get me wrong — it works. You get customizable dashboards, data history, video capture, and all the core functionality you need. But it’s not particularly flashy. The graphics and menus feel a step behind the modern, gamified, highly polished experiences you get in competing apps.

For example, Rapsodo’s Premium subscription gives you session summaries, insights compared to different handicap levels, and practice recommendations. Garmin’s Home Tee Hero simulator lets you play any course in the world mapped by GPS.

FligthtScope? They’re still very much about the raw data. Which is fine if that’s what you want. But if you’re someon who values slick software, gamified training, or a more modern user interface, the Gen2 might feel a little barebones.

So reason number three not to buy the Gen2: The Software lags behind newer competitors.

Let’s talk dollars.

At $1,199, the Mevo Gen2 is significantly more expensive than options like the Garmin Approach R10 ($599), the Swing Caddie SC4 Pro ($599.99), the Rapsodo MLM2PRO ($699.99), and the Square ($699.99).

Yes, the Gen2 avoids subscriptions. And yes, over time that cost difference can shrink, especially compared to the MLM2PRO, which basically requires a $199 annual membership to unlock its best features.

But still, $1,199 is a lot of money. It’s in that middle round where some golfers might think: “Why not just spend a little more and get the Mevo+ with the Pro Package?” Or conversely: “Why not save a few hundred bucks and get the Rapsodo with video built right in, or the camera-based Square?”

In other words, the Gen2 sits in this awkward in-between space. It’s pricier than the consumer-friendly units, but it doesn’t quite replace the full firepower of the Mevo+ with upgrades.

And that’s something buyers need to think about. Are you really saving money compared to a fully loaded Mevo+? Or would you rather spend less upfront on an MLM2PRO or R10 even if you sacrifice some accuracy?

So reason number four not to buy the Gen2: The price point sits in a tricky middle zone.

This one’s a little more subtle, but it’s worth mentioning.

The Mevo Gen2 isn’t just a new launch monitor. It’s also a strategic pivot for FlightScope. The company has already said the Gen2 will eventually replace the Mevo+ as their core product. That means the Gen2 is essentially the “bridge” device in this transition.

And that can be a little risky.

Right now, you don’t know whether FligthtScope is going to open up Pro Package and Face Impact upgrades for the Gen2. You don’t know if future E6 bundles will be added. You don’t know if more features are going to roll out, or if the Gen2 is always going to be the “locked down” version of the Mevo+.

In other words, the Gen2 feels like it’s still in its early days. You’re buying into a product that isn’t fully defined yet.

Compare that to the Mevo+, which has already matured, already has upgrade paths, and already has a well-established feature set.

So reason number five not to buy the Gen2: It’s a product in transition, and you might be better off waiting to see how FlightScope evolves it.

Let’s bring this all together.

Like I said at the start: I like this product. I think it offers tremendous accuracy, solid simulator compatibility, and a no-subscription model that’s really refreshing. For a lot of golfers, it’s going to be an awesome buy.

But it’s not perfect. If you want advanced club data, if you’ve got a tight indoors space, if you love slick, modern software, or if you don’t want to buy into a product that’s stll evolving, the Mevo Gen2 probably isn’t your best option.

Luckily, we’re at a point where there are so many great choices in the under-$1,200 range. Depending on what you want, either the Mevo Gen2, Rapsodo MLM2PRO, Square, Garmin Approach R10, or Swing Caddie SC4 Pro is going to give you just what you’re looking for. That said, every device is going to have its shortcomings.

So my advice is this: Know your priorities. If raw accuracy without subscriptions is what you care about most, the Gen2 is a killer deal. But if you’re the type who wants either maximum features or maximum simplicity, ther eare better fits out there.